Google AI department sued for using the health data of 1.6 million NHS patients | PC Gamer - mcallisterefors1965
Google AI department sued for using the wellness data of 1.6 million NHS patients
A sort out-carry out case has been launched against DeepMind, the Google-owned AI research company, over its use of the personal records of 1.6 million patients from the UK's National Health Service (thanks, AI News). The health data was provided past the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust in 2015.
DeepMind is acknowledged for several achievements, not least boot everyone's screwing at Starcraft 2, but it was given the records in order to make up a health app titled Streams. This was supposed to be an AI-powered assistant to healthcare professionals and has been used by the UK NHS—but no more. This August it was announced that Streams is being decommissioned, and DeepMind's own 'health' section like a sho returns a host fault.
The handing-over of patient records to one of the world's biggest technology companies was exposed by New Scientist in 2017, in a describe showing that DeepMind had access to far more data than had been publicly proclaimed. The UK Information Commission launched an investigation that subordinate the Royal Free-soil hospital hadn't done enough to protect patients' privacy: following which, DeepMind apologised. "Our investigation found a number of shortcomings in the way patient records were common for this trial," Information Commissioner Elizabeth I Denham said at the clock time. "Patients would not suffer reasonably expected their information to have been used in this way."
The new accommodate has been launched by lead plaintiff Andrew Prismall, who was a patient at the Royal Free hospital, and includes approximately 1.6 million other moved patients happening an 'prefer-prohibited' basis—that is, all parties will live included in the action unless they request otherwise.
"Presumption the very positive feel for of the NHS that I have always had during my various treatments, I was greatly attentive to rule that a technical school giant had ended up with my confidential medical records," aforesaid Prismall in a program line.
"As a patient having any sort of aesculapian treatment, the last affair you would require is your private medical records to be in the hands of one of the world's biggest applied science companies. I hope that this case will help achieve a fair issue and closure for all of the patients whose confidential records were obtained in that instance without their knowledge surgery accept."
Another wrinkle is that this comes at a time when the UK is looking to exchange its information protection regulations, following its exit from the European Union. The regnant Conservative Party sees the EU's regulations arsenic too self-abnegating and believes they stifle innovation in areas like this. "There's an opportunity for U.S. to fixed mankind-leading, gold standard data regulation which protects privacy, merely does soh in equally light-touch a room equally possible," says cultivation secretary Oliver Dowden.
It is worth considering this in the wider linguistic context of the UK health divine service, which is something of political field when it comes to the topic of support. The NHS operates on a principle of free healthcare at the point of use, and is funded past general taxation. Over recent decades it has made increasing use of privatised healthcare services in its provision, and the encroachment of the private sector into this national wellness scheme is a sweltry Solanum tuberosum: for some it's an economic necessity and a question of prime, for others it's the slippery incline to an American-way health care system. If you want a current case of this, look at the campaign to closure big information solid Palantir partnering with the NHS.
So this has to be seen as part of that larger battle: a situation where the NHS was providing patient data to a private companion, which was victimization it to build an app that IT could and then sell back down to the NHS.
The sheath will explore crucial questions for our times, and is by no more agency as acuminate as DeepMind bad NHS unspoilt. DeepMind has undeniably made crucial knowledge domain advances with things like AlphaFold, tools equal it are part of the future of medicine, and they need to be trained on cosmic data sets. Concurrently individual privacy is a cornerstone of western beau monde and, as Mr Prismall says, IT is disgraceful to come across that a company the size of Google has had entree to unity's health data. Whatever the courts decide in this particular case, it's a topic we'll be discussing for decades to come in.
Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/google-ai-division-sued-for-using-the-health-data-of-16-million-nhs-patients/
Posted by: mcallisterefors1965.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Google AI department sued for using the health data of 1.6 million NHS patients | PC Gamer - mcallisterefors1965"
Post a Comment